Avril Coleridge-Taylor always felt the weight of her father’s heritage. Being the child of the celebrated composer Samuel Coleridge-Taylor, among the best-known English artists of the early 20th century, Avril’s identity was shrouded in the lingering obscurity of bygone eras.
Not long ago, I reflected on these memories as I made arrangements to produce the inaugural album of the composer’s concerto for piano composed in 1936. Boasting emotional harmonies, heartfelt tunes, and valiant rhythms, her composition will offer audiences fascinating insight into how this artist – an artist in conflict originating from the early 1900s – conceived of her existence as a artist with mixed heritage.
Yet about legacies. It requires time to adjust, to recognize outlines as they actually appear, to separate fact from misrepresentation, and I had been afraid to address Avril’s past for some time.
I deeply hoped her to be following in her father’s footsteps. To some extent, she was. The pastoral English palettes of Samuel’s influence can be detected in several pieces, including From the Hills (1934) and Sussex Landscape (1940). Yet it suffices to review the titles of her father’s compositions to understand how he identified as both a champion of UK romantic tradition and also a advocate of the African diaspora.
At this point parent and child seemed to diverge.
The United States evaluated Samuel by the brilliance of his art instead of the colour of his skin.
During his studies at the prestigious music college, Samuel – the son of a parent from Sierra Leone and a white English mother – started to lean into his background. When the poet of color this literary figure came to London in 1897, the 21-year-old composer actively pursued him. He composed Dunbar’s African Romances into music and the following year adapted his verses for a musical work, Dream Lovers. Then came the choral piece that put Samuel on the map: Hiawatha’s Wedding Feast.
Drawing from this American writer’s The Song of Hiawatha, Samuel’s Hiawatha was an international hit, particularly among African Americans who felt vicarious pride as the majority evaluated the composer by the brilliance of his art as opposed to the his background.
Fame did not reduce his activism. In 1900, he participated in the First Pan African Conference in the UK where he met the African American intellectual this influential figure and observed a variety of discussions, covering the oppression of Black South Africans. He was a campaigner to his final days. He sustained relationships with pioneers of civil rights like this intellectual and this leader, delivered his own speeches on ending discrimination, and even discussed issues of racism with the American leader while visiting to the US capital in that year. As for his music, reminisced Du Bois, “he made his mark so notably as a creative artist that it will endure.” He died in the early 20th century, at 37 years old. Yet how might her father have reacted to his daughter’s decision to be in the African nation in the 1950s?
“Offspring of Renowned Musician expresses approval to S African Bias,” appeared as a heading in the community journal Jet magazine. The system “seems to me the right policy”, the composer stated Jet. Upon further questioning, she qualified her remarks: she was not in favor with the system “fundamentally” and it “could be left to work itself out, directed by well-meaning residents of every background”. Had Avril been more aligned to her father’s politics, or born in the US under segregation, she may have reconsidered about the policy. However, existence had shielded her.
“I hold a British passport,” she said, “and the authorities failed to question me about my race.” Therefore, with her “light” skin (as Jet put it), she traveled among the Europeans, supported by their praise for her deceased parent. She presented about her family’s work at the Cape Town university and directed the South African Broadcasting Corporation Orchestra in the city, including the inspiring part of her concerto, subtitled: “Dedicated to my Father.” While a confident pianist on her own, she avoided playing as the lead performer in her concerto. Rather, she always led as the leader; and so the segregated ensemble played under her baton.
She desired, as she stated, she “might bring a change”. But by 1954, things fell apart. After authorities became aware of her Black ancestry, she could no longer stay the nation. Her British passport didn’t protect her, the British high commissioner urged her to go or risk imprisonment. She returned to England, deeply ashamed as the scale of her innocence dawned. “This experience was a painful one,” she stated. Increasing her embarrassment was the release in 1955 of her controversial discussion, a year after her sudden departure from South Africa.
Upon contemplating with these legacies, I sensed a known narrative. The narrative of identifying as British until it’s challenged – one that calls to mind troops of color who fought on behalf of the English throughout the global conflict and survived only to be denied their due compensation. Along with the Windrush era,
Elara is a digital artist and designer passionate about blending technology with creativity to inspire others.